N4G's policy potentially promotes plagiarism

Printable Version
All Forums >> [N4G Related] >> Site Suggestions and Help >> N4G's policy potentially promotes plagiarism Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
N4G's policy potentially promotes plagiarism - May-1th-2008 17:36:42   
pjeigh


Posts: 22
Joined: Jan.-18th-2008
Status: offline
In another thread, I was pointed to this N4G page concerning quotes and copying/pasting/rewriting passages fromother sites.

Here is the section that bothers me most:
...However for most stories you don’t need to use quotes but you can instead copy a few paragraphs of the text and edit out any “We” , “I” or “us”. These can then be often be replaced by the websites name.

Length of News Posts Do not copy two or three pages of text from the source story. A N4G news post should include just the main points of a news story (often found in the first part of the source article), so readers who are interested in more details can click through. In most cases 1 -3 paragraphs is enough...
It is never OK to copy/paste and rewrite anything written by someone else and even worse to rewrite it to appear as your own. Although the N4G page does explan that a good intro for proper credit should be written, the above passage implies that plagiarism is OK - and even encouraged - by N4G.

(Even trickier for untrained writers to accept is that, even if you wrote a passage for another site/publication, you still need to give proper attribution - yes, sometmes you'll quote yourself).

Plagiarism is never OK. Keep N4G (and yourself) out of legal trouble and just don't do it.
Post #: 1
RE: N4G's policy potentially promotes plagiarism - May-1th-2008 18:31:57   
harry190


Posts: 2675
Joined: Feb.-10th-2008
From: Hades
Status: offline
That''s why you report so much?Unnecessary reports?
Plagiarism?What are you talking about.Maybe you did not understand the concept.
This is a site where you get links to other sites,not a site where you compile all the info and make it
your own.I saw some pof your posts,and frankly,they are not any different from what you are advocating against.

_____________________________


(in reply to pjeigh)
Post #: 2
RE: N4G's policy potentially promotes plagiarism - May-2th-2008 5:27:33   
zonetrooper5


Posts: 1943
Joined: Mar.-23th-2007
From: England
Status: offline
Sorry OP but you are not reading the rules correctly. Read it again and you will see that you got mixed up.

_____________________________


(in reply to harry190)
Post #: 3
RE: N4G's policy potentially promotes plagiarism - May-2th-2008 6:07:00   
Dukester101


Posts: 4557
Joined: Mar.-27th-2007
From: Ohio
Status: offline
N4G does not and never will endorse plagiarism. In fact, it is condoned by N4G period.

If a user attempts to use plagiarism and take credit for someone else's work, that user will be restricted from site features for an indefinite period.

I suggest you take time to read the rules and guidelines more clearly before you make assumptions that N4G endorses plagiarism.

_____________________________

"Defensor Fortis (Defenders of the Force)"
This post is provided as-is, with no warranties, and confers no rights.

(in reply to zonetrooper5)
Post #: 4
RE: N4G's policy potentially promotes plagiarism - May-2th-2008 22:05:34   
pjeigh


Posts: 22
Joined: Jan.-18th-2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dukester101

N4G does not and never will endorse plagiarism. In fact, it is condoned by N4G period.

If a user attempts to use plagiarism and take credit for someone else's work, that user will be restricted from site features for an indefinite period.

I suggest you take time to read the rules and guidelines more clearly before you make assumptions that N4G endorses plagiarism.


I do not believe N4G purposefully endorses plagiarism but the guidelines linked above sure make it seem like the site does. Read the section again, look at the definition of "plagiarism" (and "condone" while you ar at it) and you'll better understand what I am writing about.

I highly suggest that N4G revises the policy/guidelines and not suggest that anyone simply rewrite anything written by another person or site. 

With a peer approval process, it's far too easy for plagiarised material to get through the system and put N4G in legal jeopardy.

(in reply to Dukester101)
Post #: 5
RE: N4G's policy potentially promotes plagiarism - May-2th-2008 22:10:57   
pjeigh


Posts: 22
Joined: Jan.-18th-2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: harry190
That''s why you report so much?Unnecessary reports?
Plagiarism?What are you talking about.Maybe you did not understand the concept.
This is a site where you get links to other sites,not a site where you compile all the info and make it your own.I saw some pof your posts,and frankly,they are not any different from what you are advocating against.


I'd love for you to explain your concept of plagiarism. Please, do share your insights.

(in reply to harry190)
Post #: 6
RE: N4G's policy potentially promotes plagiarism - May-2th-2008 23:36:19   
harry190


Posts: 2675
Joined: Feb.-10th-2008
From: Hades
Status: offline
Don't play this card with me.Look at this,then you can go complain elsewhere.

http://www.n4g.com/gaming/News-103165.aspx

_____________________________


(in reply to pjeigh)
Post #: 7
RE: N4G's policy potentially promotes plagiarism - May-3th-2008 0:46:25   
pjeigh


Posts: 22
Joined: Jan.-18th-2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: harry190
Don't play this card with me.Look at this,then you can go complain elsewhere.
http://www.n4g.com/gaming/News-103165.aspx


I played it and you still have not picked it up. I suspect you will not, which is fine. As Mark Twain said/wrote, "It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt."

The mistake I made with that particular N4G contribution, and I aknowledge it in the comments section, was changing the headline. I had seen it done with other submissions so I thought it was OK. I was mistaken. By the time I went back to the original headline, the submission was already approved and, therefore, uneditable. It was one of my earliest contributions to N4G. I made that mistake and have not made it since then. I've even made other mistakes and continue to try and avoid them. As for the rest of that contribution, it is a summary of the original article.

I've even been guilty of copying sections of an original article and, comforming to guidelines, edited it into a summary. I probably did that once or twice early on, but I no longer do that since it can be considered plagiarism.

I have simply noticed a clarification in the N4G Guidelines that should be changed.

I'm hoping a moderator or two has read this, so please forward my suggestion to the appropriate person/people.

(in reply to harry190)
Post #: 8
RE: N4G's policy potentially promotes plagiarism - May-3th-2008 1:16:29   
harry190


Posts: 2675
Joined: Feb.-10th-2008
From: Hades
Status: offline
  1. to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own
  2. to use (another's production) without crediting the source
  3. to commit literary theft
  4. to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source.
In other words, plagiarism is an act of fraud. It involves both stealing someone else's work and lying about it afterward.


All of the following are considered plagiarism:
  • turning in someone else's work as your own
  • copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit
  • failing to put a quotation in quotation marks
  • giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation
  • changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit
  • copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not (see our section on "fair use" rules)
Most cases of plagiarism can be avoided, however, by citing sources. Simply acknowledging that certain material has been borrowed, and providing your audience with the information necessary to find that source, is usually enough to prevent plagiarism.


Mark Twain was a cultured individual,who probably thought twice about something.I can see you cite the source.Nice,now how about following this principle?

_____________________________


(in reply to pjeigh)
Post #: 9
RE: N4G's policy potentially promotes plagiarism - May-3th-2008 7:24:21   
zonetrooper5


Posts: 1943
Joined: Mar.-23th-2007
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pjeigh

quote:

ORIGINAL: harry190
Don't play this card with me.Look at this,then you can go complain elsewhere.
http://www.n4g.com/gaming/News-103165.aspx


I played it and you still have not picked it up. I suspect you will not, which is fine. As Mark Twain said/wrote, "It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt."

The mistake I made with that particular N4G contribution, and I aknowledge it in the comments section, was changing the headline. I had seen it done with other submissions so I thought it was OK. I was mistaken. By the time I went back to the original headline, the submission was already approved and, therefore, uneditable. It was one of my earliest contributions to N4G. I made that mistake and have not made it since then. I've even made other mistakes and continue to try and avoid them. As for the rest of that contribution, it is a summary of the original article.

I've even been guilty of copying sections of an original article and, comforming to guidelines, edited it into a summary. I probably did that once or twice early on, but I no longer do that since it can be considered plagiarism.

I have simply noticed a clarification in the N4G Guidelines that should be changed.

I'm hoping a moderator or two has read this, so please forward my suggestion to the appropriate person/people.


Please read that rule again, it makes sense.

_____________________________


(in reply to pjeigh)
Post #: 10
RE: N4G's policy potentially promotes plagiarism - May-4th-2008 16:09:45   
pjeigh


Posts: 22
Joined: Jan.-18th-2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: harry190
Mark Twain was a cultured individual,who probably thought twice about something.I can see you cite the source.Nice,now how about following this principle?


Follow the prinicple of...? I do use quotes and cite courses. I make all efforts to avoid plagiarism. BTW: Where did you get that list you posted above? Again, personal attacks is not my point for this thread.

My point is that N4G's guidelines for this are confusing.

How is telling writers to copy, paste and edit something witten by another person without putting it in quotes and properly citing the source not supporting plagiarism?

(in reply to harry190)
Post #: 11
RE: N4G's policy potentially promotes plagiarism - May-4th-2008 16:24:43   
pjeigh


Posts: 22
Joined: Jan.-18th-2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: zonetrooper5
Please read that rule again, it makes sense.


Please explain how, "However for most stories you don’t need to use quotes but you can instead copy a few paragraphs of the text and edit out any “We” , “I” or “us”. These can then be often be replaced by the websites name." is not plagiarism?

- You copy a paragraph (sentence, whatever) from the original source.
- You change the prounouns into nouns/site names.
- You are told not to put quotes around it.
- You submit it to N4G (as your own).

Elsewhere in the Guidelines it instructs writers to write a summary and cite the source. Excellent. The issue I have is with the (grammatically awkward) sentence:

"However for most stories you don’t need to use quotes but you can instead copy a few paragraphs of the text and edit out any “We” , “I” or “us”. These can then be often be replaced by the websites name."

(in reply to zonetrooper5)
Post #: 12
RE: N4G's policy potentially promotes plagiarism - May-4th-2008 16:46:18   
pjeigh


Posts: 22
Joined: Jan.-18th-2008
Status: offline
In light of this thread, I'm curious as to what you (and everyone else) think about this GTA post http://n4g.com/gaming/News-141425.aspx compared to the original article at  http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/05/02/gamer-completes-gta-iv-360-in-17-mins-15-secs/
.

(in reply to pjeigh)
Post #: 13
RE: N4G's policy potentially promotes plagiarism - May-5th-2008 9:59:52   
zonetrooper5


Posts: 1943
Joined: Mar.-23th-2007
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pjeigh

quote:

ORIGINAL: zonetrooper5
Please read that rule again, it makes sense.


Please explain how, "However for most stories you don’t need to use quotes but you can instead copy a few paragraphs of the text and edit out any “We” , “I” or “us”. These can then be often be replaced by the websites name." is not plagiarism?

- You copy a paragraph (sentence, whatever) from the original source.
- You change the prounouns into nouns/site names.
- You are told not to put quotes around it.
- You submit it to N4G (as your own).

Elsewhere in the Guidelines it instructs writers to write a summary and cite the source. Excellent. The issue I have is with the (grammatically awkward) sentence:

"However for most stories you don’t need to use quotes but you can instead copy a few paragraphs of the text and edit out any “We” , “I” or “us”. These can then be often be replaced by the websites name."


For example, say you were submiting an article from IGN about GTA IV or whatever. The writer of that article would be using the words "I played GTA IV and I'm delighted to say its rules, the fighting system has been overhauled."

You take out the I because its not your article and you didn't play the game and then replace it with IGN played GTA IV and they are delighted to say it rules, the fighting system has be overhauled."

There you go, now read that rule again and look at my example. All your doing it chaning certain words so it makes sense.

_____________________________


(in reply to pjeigh)
Post #: 14
RE: N4G's policy potentially promotes plagiarism - May-5th-2008 11:17:24   
pjeigh


Posts: 22
Joined: Jan.-18th-2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: zonetrooper5
For example, say you were submiting an article from IGN about GTA IV or whatever. The writer of that article would be using the words "I played GTA IV and I'm delighted to say its rules, the fighting system has been overhauled."

You take out the I because its not your article and you didn't play the game and then replace it with IGN played GTA IV and they are delighted to say it rules, the fighting system has be overhauled."

There you go, now read that rule again and look at my example. All your doing it chaning certain words so it makes sense.


You just gave an example of how to plagiarize. You are editing someone else's words and presenting them as your own. (Just b/c N4G has that as a "rule" - actually a guideline - and "makes sense" does not make it right.)

You got the first part of your rewrite right, but still need to quote the rest. Using your words and example (and correcting some spelling), it should look more like this:
IGN played GTA IV and they are delighted to say, "it rules, the fighting system has been overhauled."
Even better would be something like,
In IGN's review of Grand Theft Auto IV (GTA IV), the writer declares, "it rules," attributing some of the game's success to an improved fighting system.
I would have even used the small quote as "its [sic] rules" if there was the typo in the original text.

(There are many other style/grammar problems with that tiny example, but I'm sticking to the plagiarism topic for this discussion.)

< Message edited by pjeigh -- May-5th-2008 11:20:21 >

(in reply to zonetrooper5)
Post #: 15
RE: N4G's policy potentially promotes plagiarism - May-5th-2008 11:39:22   
Dukester101


Posts: 4557
Joined: Mar.-27th-2007
From: Ohio
Status: offline
The unique nature of N4G is such that when a user submits a story, they do so by providing a resource.

Unless that user is the writer of that article, then the user that submitted the story is not "stealing" another's work. Rather, they are submitting the story to a newsite that collects hundreds of stories a day and publishes the in a central location.

Summarizing an article is not plagiarism when sources are quoted and provided. The user does not claim the work as their own. If there were no sources provided, then yes it IS plagiarism, but that is not the case here.

However, I can see there is no reasoning with you, as you are intent on claiming plagiarism. That is not the case, and if you wish to further discuss the matter, take it up with an administrator (i.e. Dusty).

< Message edited by Dukester101 -- May-5th-2008 11:40:36 >


_____________________________

"Defensor Fortis (Defenders of the Force)"
This post is provided as-is, with no warranties, and confers no rights.

(in reply to pjeigh)
Post #: 16
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [N4G Related] >> Site Suggestions and Help >> N4G's policy potentially promotes plagiarism Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode

0.188