Post Your PC Specs Here!

ORIGINAL: Tempist

Ew, that's a terrible compie. Makes me puke in my mouth a little.

How so? Do back up your statement with fact.

ORIGINAL: - The Corrupt -

ORIGINAL: Resistance2

quad core processor q6600 (i think), 3gb of ram, 2 nvidia 8800gt graphics card

9.6Ghz processor and 1GB of VRAM? Not too shabby.

[sm=D5C0ABCCC843450E901456F5884E030F.gif]

ORIGINAL: zo6_lover27

ORIGINAL: - The Corrupt -

ORIGINAL: Resistance2

quad core processor q6600 (i think), 3gb of ram, 2 nvidia 8800gt graphics card

9.6Ghz processor and 1GB of VRAM? Not too shabby.

[sm=D5C0ABCCC843450E901456F5884E030F.gif]

Each core of your processor runs at 2.4GHz. Add them up!

ORIGINAL: - The Corrupt -

ORIGINAL: zo6_lover27

ORIGINAL: - The Corrupt -

ORIGINAL: Resistance2

quad core processor q6600 (i think), 3gb of ram, 2 nvidia 8800gt graphics card

9.6Ghz processor and 1GB of VRAM? Not too shabby.

[sm=D5C0ABCCC843450E901456F5884E030F.gif]

Each core of your processor runs at 2.4GHz. Add them up!

I don't think that's how it works.
not sure though

ORIGINAL: zo6_lover27

I don't think that's how it works.
not sure though

It doesn't, no... But I do!

ORIGINAL: - The Corrupt -

ORIGINAL: zo6_lover27

I don't think that's how it works.
not sure though

It doesn't, no... But I do!

*facepalm*

It doesn't work like that, since an Intel Core Duo 2.0 GHz is considerably slower than an Intel Core 2 Duo 2.0 GHz processor.

Both CPUs have 2 cores, but one is updated and improved technology.

Well, I know that one things for sure.
My processor is a piece of ****

ORIGINAL: - The Corrupt -

How so? Do back up your statement with fact.

 
First off you're using a Foxconn mobo. Can't say I've used them, can't say I've heard good or bad things about them.
 
Next, you have 4GB of Ram and using Vista Premium. I'm not 100% sure but you may not get to use all 4GBs of that ram given that 32bit apps can't use 4GBs.
 
8800s are cheaper now, but a 9800GTX+ would be worth more. Over all, an ATI card would be better as the Mobo better supports it.
 
USB ports are kinda moot. I have about 10 and really only use 2 (then again I'm not using a printer or scanner)
 
And for the life of me I can't figure out why you're using so many hard drives in the bloody thing. Are you sure you have enough SATA ports to handle it all on that mobo?

Push it to pop it!
Rock it to lock it!
Break it to make it!
__________________

ORIGINAL: Tempist

ORIGINAL: - The Corrupt -

How so? Do back up your statement with fact.

First off you're using a Foxconn mobo. Can't say I've used them, can't say I've heard good or bad things about them.

Next, you have 4GB of Ram and using Vista Premium. I'm not 100% sure but you may not get to use all 4GBs of that ram given that 32bit apps can't use 4GBs.

8800s are cheaper now, but a 9800GTX+ would be worth more. Over all, an ATI card would be better as the Mobo better supports it.

USB ports are kinda moot. I have about 10 and really only use 2 (then again I'm not using a printer or scanner)

And for the life of me I can't figure out why you're using so many hard drives in the bloody thing. Are you sure you have enough SATA ports to handle it all on that mobo?

That particular MoBo is actually a decent one. 32 bit OSes can see a MAX of 4GB of RAM. Only 3GB shows in the system properties, but the system will always utilize the 4GB of RAM. The 8800GTX is still a good card, although perhaps an HD 4870 would be better here. As for the USB/HDD issues, I don't care to evaluate that. I would assume some of those HDDs would be external, and the power supply is plentiful, though.

I don't see why that system makes you "puke" at all.

Oh, and that OS of hers is 64-bit anyhoodles, with 32-bit compatibility. 32-bit programs not using RAM only becomes a problem when you go over 4GB.

ORIGINAL: Satanas

ORIGINAL: Tempist

ORIGINAL: - The Corrupt -

How so? Do back up your statement with fact.

First off you're using a Foxconn mobo. Can't say I've used them, can't say I've heard good or bad things about them.

Next, you have 4GB of Ram and using Vista Premium. I'm not 100% sure but you may not get to use all 4GBs of that ram given that 32bit apps can't use 4GBs.

8800s are cheaper now, but a 9800GTX+ would be worth more. Over all, an ATI card would be better as the Mobo better supports it.

USB ports are kinda moot. I have about 10 and really only use 2 (then again I'm not using a printer or scanner)

And for the life of me I can't figure out why you're using so many hard drives in the bloody thing. Are you sure you have enough SATA ports to handle it all on that mobo?

That particular MoBo is actually a decent one. 32 bit OSes can see a MAX of 4GB of RAM. Only 3GB shows in the system properties, but the system will always utilize the 4GB of RAM. The 8800GTX is still a good card, although perhaps an HD 4870 would be better here. As for the USB/HDD issues, I don't care to evaluate that.

I don't see why that system makes you "puke" at all.

It makes me puke, seeing that its like, 200x better than mine

mine...
 
Core2Duo E4500 2.2GHz
Gigabyte P31 chipset Motherboard 1333FSB
GeForce 8600GT 512MB GDDR2
640GB (total of 4) HDD (1 IDE + 3 SATA)
2GB DDR2 800MHz RAM
Sound Blaster Audigy 2 XS

intel core duo 2.4 ghz
4gb Ram 667 Mhz DDR2
120 gb Hdd

PSN: Switch_2

Weirdo Switch

ORIGINAL: Tempist

First off you're using a Foxconn mobo. Can't say I've used them, can't say I've heard good or bad things about them.

Next, you have 4GB of Ram and using Vista Premium. I'm not 100% sure but you may not get to use all 4GBs of that ram given that 32bit apps can't use 4GBs.

8800s are cheaper now, but a 9800GTX+ would be worth more. Over all, an ATI card would be better as the Mobo better supports it.

USB ports are kinda moot. I have about 10 and really only use 2 (then again I'm not using a printer or scanner)

And for the life of me I can't figure out why you're using so many hard drives in the bloody thing. Are you sure you have enough SATA ports to handle it all on that mobo?

The only reasons you have for saying it'll make you puke is that you think I have too much storage space and that my Graphics Card isn't the best? As Satanas said, the 4TB of harddrives are all external and are all practically filled already with all the stuff I have. Hence the need for so many USB ports, given how four will be taken up practically all the time.

You guys have a good high spec PC. Mine is outdated....

AMD 64 X2 4400+
Mem 1GB x 2
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
SB Audigy 2

ORIGINAL: - The Corrupt -

The only reasons you have for saying it'll make you puke is that you think I have too much storage space and that my Graphics Card isn't the best? As Satanas said, the 4TB of harddrives are all external and are all practically filled already with all the stuff I have. Hence the need for so many USB ports, given how four will be taken up practically all the time.

 
Thy box is not leet. And I'm willing to bet your case has like fluffy kitties all over it too. :D

Push it to pop it!
Rock it to lock it!
Break it to make it!
__________________

------

ORIGINAL: Satanas

Edit: I'm buying this monitor:
http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=3728674&CatId=2775

 
I cannot understand why people get 22" monitors. Just spend the little extra and get a 24" monitor which has a better resolutiona and will most likely come with a HDMI connection.

Push it to pop it!
Rock it to lock it!
Break it to make it!
__________________

------

ORIGINAL: Satanas

The GPU supports HDMI, but I'm going to be converting this crap no matter what. It's no problem to use DVI in 1680, really. HDMI isn't a world of difference as people make it out to be.

 
DVI to HDMI works fine as it's a digital to digital transition. I'm just saying that over all, for a just a little more you're going to get a whole lot more out of your monitor @ 24" over 22".
 
Over all a 24" isn't that much bigger than a 22". Look up the dimentions of each and check it out.

Push it to pop it!
Rock it to lock it!
Break it to make it!
__________________