LJWooly
Posts: 1385
Joined: Sep.-22th-2007
From: England :-)
Status: online
|
Well, you have shed new light onto the points I haven't properly taken into consideration, and conveyed your points in a mature and well-mannered fashion, so thank you for your educated response. But I digress. Back to the debate... The only problem with your argument is that you state that "Sony has given us diversity but also given corps the idea of more is better not better is better". Well, that's true enough for Sony, what with the countless Madden annual clones and duplicate basketball games, etc. but this is also exactly what Nintendo is guilty of. My point is, your argument of Nintendo not having to create new characters on a regular basis, unlike their competitors, can be looked at both ways. One possibility is that the characters taht Mr. Miyamoto dreamt up are so original and perfect, that they could last forever, no matter what. However, I feel that the real reason these characters have found it so easy to stay alive, is that people don't really question the originality of nintendo's games and their protagonists, simply because it's, you know... Nintendo. It's Nintendo, therefore it's okay. It just is. Do you get what I'm saying? Now, I won't argue that Nintendo do, at least, keep the quality unlike some (EA) but my point is that, due to the warm and fuzzy nature that Nintendo have garnered from fans via making cute and loveable games, and keeping the violence dial at zero, has made them almost invulnerable to criticism in regards to originality or milking of much-loved franchises. My other problem with Nintendo is the direction they went with the Wii this generation, and that's sitting nicely on the support from the 'casual' gamer, meaning that some half-arsed crap like Carnival Games sells like hotcakes, and a genuinely original and fun game like Zack & Wicki falls far below the 500k mark. Meanwhile, Nintendo is laughing all the way to the bank, watching the money pour in, and only bothering to make a decet game every now and then. The aforementioned "warm and fuzzy image" I brought up earlier stops people from raising concern about Nintendo's motivations. Also, Nintendo have defeated the point of "better is better", simply by the sheer amount of shovelware that exists on the Wii today. Sure, they don't make it, but they allow it to happen, becasue it costs them very little, and their gains are unparalelled. As you can see, I tried to avoid the "fanboy wall o' text" by spacing it a lot, but my hands are still knackered
|