Just how many reports does it take to get an article taken down? This article ( http://n4g.com/gaming/News-423228.aspx ) has a **** lot.. just look..( http://n4g.com/PopUpPages/Obj_Report.aspx?UserID=&ObjID=423228 ) why and the hell does it take more than that to get one taken down.. wtf?

It needs the TDA (take down article) GOD, but he's chilling with Zues right now on vacation...

 

Wrong subforum, dood. Isn't the Contributor Subforum for this kind of stuff?

villevalorox


Just how many reports does it take to get an article taken down? This article ( http://n4g.com/gaming/News-423228.aspx ) has a **** lot.. just look..( http://n4g.com/PopUpPages/Obj_Report.aspx?UserID=&ObjID=423228 ) why and the hell does it take more than that to get one taken down.. wtf?

A report of lame does absolutely nothing except make you look like a crybaby. All editorials have a right to be posted unless they are advertising which is SPAM.

Try this.

Reporting a story as spam in an attempt to fail a story when it clearly is not spam, is a decent way to get yourself restricted for a bit.

I recommend reading this before you continue reporting stories: http://forums.n4g.com/Reporting-Stories-in-Pending-m486146.aspx

Well i guess you could put your reason that this article wasn't made to be journalistic in any sense, maybe that would work... the evidence is clearly there in the guy's comments of the article on that site.

I mean first time around the gary martson person said something i thought he was being sarcastic, but keep reading the comments.

would that qualify an article to be lame?

Also, this:

"First off, that title there is only there to get all of you uncharted fan boys interested"

I mean come on.... really now guys?  That's like putting "Obama is an idiot" in an article's title just to stir up some fire and not any real journalistic value.