Change Page:
12345 > | Showing page 1 of 5, messages 1 to 20 of 89
siberiantiger28
-
Total Posts
:
71
-
Reward points
:
0
- Joined: 7/20/2007
- Location: uk
-
Status: offline
|
WOW on PS3?
-
Sunday, November 09, 2008 2:30 AM
I was at a product roadshow a few days ago in the UK, at this roadshow show Sony was there showing off what we can expect from the PS3 in the coming few months. All the usual suspects were there LBP, Killzone2, M2 etc, anyway myself and a couple of other people got talking to one of the Sony guys there. He said Sony and Activision are working on a PS3 version of WOW, infact a version that you will able to link to an exsisting account on your PC. He also went on to say that no one at Sony expects to see the best from the PS3 for around another 2 or 3 years.
|
|
skatevrything
-
Total Posts
:
99
-
Reward points
:
0
- Joined: 7/26/2008
-
Status: offline
|
RE: WOW on PS3?
-
Sunday, November 09, 2008 2:38 AM
are you freakin serious?
WoW on ps3?
that'd be so awesome
we ps3 owners dont need fable anymore!
is this confirmed?
|
|
TMANX1
-
Total Posts
:
27057
-
Reward points
:
0
- Joined: 7/19/2008
- Location: Edmonton,AB
-
Status: online
|
RE: WOW on PS3?
-
Sunday, November 09, 2008 2:39 AM
WoW what?come again?
|
|
Satanas
-
Total Posts
:
11012
-
Reward points
:
0
- Joined: 4/30/2007
- Location: GTA, ON, Canada
-
Status: offline
|
RE: WOW on PS3?
-
Sunday, November 09, 2008 2:53 AM
WoW can run on even the crappiest of computers. This will not happen and would be useless anyway. WoW is an MMO meant for PCs (like most Blizzard titles, at that).
Legitimately earned Bloodmask stars: 215 Fighting game gear: MadCatz SF4 Arcade FightStick Tournament Edition
|
|
MOSTAGGRESSIVE
-
Total Posts
:
49
-
Reward points
:
0
- Joined: 8/9/2008
- Location: Denmark
-
Status: offline
|
RE: WOW on PS3?
-
Sunday, November 09, 2008 2:57 AM
Wouldn't be a succes. People who's got a PS3 also has a PC/Mac in their home and if they like WoW, they're already playing it.
TROPHY COMPLETION
Uncharted: Drakes Fortune - 100%
Burnout Paradise - 100%
Mainichi Issho - 100%
Battlefield: Bad Company - 79%
Super Stardust HD - 69%
PixelJunk Eden - 33%
GTA IV - 14%
|
|
Noctis
-
Total Posts
:
235
-
Reward points
:
0
- Joined: 10/13/2008
-
Status: offline
|
RE: WOW on PS3?
-
Sunday, November 09, 2008 2:58 AM
why Activision?
|
|
NO_PUDding
-
Total Posts
:
1575
-
Reward points
:
0
- Joined: 10/28/2007
-
Status: offline
|
RE: WOW on PS3?
-
Sunday, November 09, 2008 3:19 AM
ORIGINAL: Noctis
why Activision?
You know that whole insignificant near monopolising Activision Blizzard merger thing... No?
|
|
Noctis
-
Total Posts
:
235
-
Reward points
:
0
- Joined: 10/13/2008
-
Status: offline
|
RE: WOW on PS3?
-
Sunday, November 09, 2008 3:19 AM
ORIGINAL: NO_PUDding
ORIGINAL: Noctis
why Activision?
You know that whole insignificant near monopolising merger thing...
No?
 ?
|
|
ksmooches
-
Total Posts
:
4030
-
Reward points
:
0
- Joined: 1/18/2008
- Location: MD, VA, NY (in that order)
-
Status: offline
|
RE: WOW on PS3?
-
Sunday, November 09, 2008 3:24 AM
introduction to paying for online ps3 games?
|
|
NO_PUDding
-
Total Posts
:
1575
-
Reward points
:
0
- Joined: 10/28/2007
-
Status: offline
|
RE: WOW on PS3?
-
Sunday, November 09, 2008 3:26 AM
ORIGINAL: Noctis
?
Edited, should be simpler to catch my drift. If not... Blizzard is the now the same company as Activision. But this would make no sense. More sense than it coming on the 360, becuase you are already paying, for that, so they can't make any profit, but why wouldn't Sony Online Entertainment do Everquest 2 port instead? Surely Sony would want their wares pimped, rather than Actiblizz.
ORIGINAL: ksmooches
introduction to paying for online ps3 games?
Would be 3rd party you tard. But that would be the reason that it won't make sense on LIVE, becuase no one wants to pay for their ISP, their LIVE and their MMO subscription.
<message edited by NO_PUDding on Sunday, November 09, 2008 3:27 AM>
|
|
ksmooches
-
Total Posts
:
4030
-
Reward points
:
0
- Joined: 1/18/2008
- Location: MD, VA, NY (in that order)
-
Status: offline
|
RE: WOW on PS3?
-
Sunday, November 09, 2008 3:34 AM
ORIGINAL: NO_PUDding
ORIGINAL: Noctis
?
Edited, should be simpler to catch my drift.
If not... Blizzard is the now the same company as Activision.
But this would make no sense. More sense than it coming on the 360, becuase you are already paying, for that, so they can't make any profit, but why wouldn't Sony Online Entertainment do Everquest 2 port instead? Surely Sony would want their wares pimped, rather than Actiblizz.
ORIGINAL: ksmooches
introduction to paying for online ps3 games?
Would be 3rd party you tard.
But that would be the reason that it won't make sense on LIVE, becuase no one wants to pay for their ISP, their LIVE and their MMO subscription.
DID I SAY SONY FOOL! Of course you are paying for third party boy. Just like when there was talk about paying for MAG - or any other game that has potential to require it- you would be paying whoever owns the game...dont you have to pay for extra characters on MGO? Thats not paying Sony, that's paying Konami or whoever else, man some ppl like pickin fights...prolly another little girl
 
|
|
NO_PUDding
-
Total Posts
:
1575
-
Reward points
:
0
- Joined: 10/28/2007
-
Status: offline
|
RE: WOW on PS3?
-
Sunday, November 09, 2008 3:40 AM
ORIGINAL: ksmooches
ORIGINAL: NO_PUDding
ORIGINAL: Noctis
?
Edited, should be simpler to catch my drift.
If not... Blizzard is the now the same company as Activision.
But this would make no sense. More sense than it coming on the 360, becuase you are already paying, for that, so they can't make any profit, but why wouldn't Sony Online Entertainment do Everquest 2 port instead? Surely Sony would want their wares pimped, rather than Actiblizz.
ORIGINAL: ksmooches
introduction to paying for online ps3 games?
Would be 3rd party you tard.
But that would be the reason that it won't make sense on LIVE, becuase no one wants to pay for their ISP, their LIVE and their MMO subscription.
DID I SAY SONY FOOL! Of course you are paying for third party boy. Just like when there was talk about paying for MAG - or any other game that has potential to require it- you would be paying whoever owns the game...dont you have to pay for extra characters on MGO? Thats not paying Sony, that's paying Konami or whoever else, man some ppl like pickin fights...prolly another little girl
I don't pay for third party boys. I don't need an escort service and certainly not 3 dudes.
 
|
|
ksmooches
-
Total Posts
:
4030
-
Reward points
:
0
- Joined: 1/18/2008
- Location: MD, VA, NY (in that order)
-
Status: offline
|
RE: WOW on PS3?
-
Sunday, November 09, 2008 3:44 AM
ORIGINAL: NO_PUDding
ORIGINAL: ksmooches
ORIGINAL: NO_PUDding
ORIGINAL: Noctis
?
Edited, should be simpler to catch my drift.
If not... Blizzard is the now the same company as Activision.
But this would make no sense. More sense than it coming on the 360, becuase you are already paying, for that, so they can't make any profit, but why wouldn't Sony Online Entertainment do Everquest 2 port instead? Surely Sony would want their wares pimped, rather than Actiblizz.
ORIGINAL: ksmooches
introduction to paying for online ps3 games?
Would be 3rd party you tard.
But that would be the reason that it won't make sense on LIVE, becuase no one wants to pay for their ISP, their LIVE and their MMO subscription.
DID I SAY SONY FOOL! Of course you are paying for third party boy. Just like when there was talk about paying for MAG - or any other game that has potential to require it- you would be paying whoever owns the game...dont you have to pay for extra characters on MGO? Thats not paying Sony, that's paying Konami or whoever else, man some ppl like pickin fights...prolly another little girl
I don't pay for third party boys.
I don't need an escort service and certainly not 3 dudes.
lol...although the grammer i put in doesnt allow for that statement, it was a good thought
|
|
Forbidden_Darkness
-
Total Posts
:
1409
-
Reward points
:
0
- Joined: 11/6/2007
- Location: the darkness that consumes me...
-
Status: offline
|
RE: WOW on PS3?
-
Sunday, November 09, 2008 4:03 AM
It would make perfect sense, PSN is the perfect place for MMOs
"Our world is shrowded in darkness, consuming the lands and the people who inhabit them, for the fallen become the shadows inwhich our nightmares are created from."
|
|
NO_PUDding
-
Total Posts
:
1575
-
Reward points
:
0
- Joined: 10/28/2007
-
Status: offline
|
RE: WOW on PS3?
-
Sunday, November 09, 2008 4:03 AM
ORIGINAL: ksmooches
ORIGINAL: NO_PUDding
ORIGINAL: ksmooches
ORIGINAL: NO_PUDding
ORIGINAL: Noctis
?
Edited, should be simpler to catch my drift.
If not... Blizzard is the now the same company as Activision.
But this would make no sense. More sense than it coming on the 360, becuase you are already paying, for that, so they can't make any profit, but why wouldn't Sony Online Entertainment do Everquest 2 port instead? Surely Sony would want their wares pimped, rather than Actiblizz.
ORIGINAL: ksmooches
introduction to paying for online ps3 games?
Would be 3rd party you tard.
But that would be the reason that it won't make sense on LIVE, becuase no one wants to pay for their ISP, their LIVE and their MMO subscription.
DID I SAY SONY FOOL! Of course you are paying for third party boy. Just like when there was talk about paying for MAG - or any other game that has potential to require it- you would be paying whoever owns the game...dont you have to pay for extra characters on MGO? Thats not paying Sony, that's paying Konami or whoever else, man some ppl like pickin fights...prolly another little girl
I don't pay for third party boys.
I don't need an escort service and certainly not 3 dudes.
lol...although the grammer i put in doesnt allow for that statement, it was a good thought
Seems grammar doesn't really matter to you though does it? Spelling neither? Argue those points, you have to be perfect. So arguing grammar and spelling is never ideal.
|
|
Odion
-
Total Posts
:
15663
-
Reward points
:
0
- Joined: 4/16/2007
-
Status: offline
|
RE: WOW on PS3?
-
Sunday, November 09, 2008 7:42 AM
1. Blizzard would never allow another team to touch their games, esp WoW 2. Blizzard has said they will not release a console version for like a hundred different reason. - Creating an entirely new control scheme and UI
- Having to learn how to program for the PS3 and then create ANOTHER team to create PS3 versions of the patch
- They have 12 million + people
This is a massive lie made by the OP, no one in a real business would just throw out to a random dude something that big.
BLIZZARD BURN IN THE FIRES OF RAGE STARCRAFT2 DELAYED TILL POSSIBLY JUNE 2010
|
|
heyheyhey
-
Total Posts
:
4325
-
Reward points
:
0
- Joined: 1/1/2008
-
Status: offline
|
RE: WOW on PS3?
-
Sunday, November 09, 2008 8:44 AM
ORIGINAL: Odion
1. Blizzard would never allow another team to touch their games, esp WoW
2. Blizzard has said they will not release a console version for like a hundred different reason. - Creating an entirely new control scheme and UI
- Having to learn how to program for the PS3 and then create ANOTHER team to create PS3 versions of the patch
- They have 12 million + people
This is a massive lie made by the OP, no one in a real business would just throw out to a random dude something that big.
agreed.... it's not like Blizzard NEED to make console versions... saying that their PC fanbase is sufficient is an understatement besides.. with NCsoft and SOE making multiple MMO's for the PS3, WoW would certainly over-saturate the genre on the console I'd much rather see games like The Agency take off on the system rather than get eclipsed by "OMGWoWONTEHPS3!!!!!"
Bring back Maddens Raiders!!!
|
|
Rice
-
Total Posts
:
2970
-
Reward points
:
0
- Joined: 11/26/2007
- Location: T-dot, Canada
-
Status: offline
|
RE: WOW on PS3?
-
Sunday, November 09, 2008 10:02 AM
There goes free online.
|
|
DarkSniper
-
Total Posts
:
3714
-
Reward points
:
0
- Joined: 10/5/2007
- Location: Texas
-
Status: offline
|
RE: WOW on PS3?
-
Sunday, November 09, 2008 10:37 AM
While the PC has a very strong market, I think porting this successful MMO to PS3 would be a very wise manuever. It will definitely give the PS3 a broad range of buyers who would have never thought to purchase the console and introduce them to really good premiere gaming. If WOW came to the PS3, I'd consider buying it. 
|
|
dkgshiz
-
Total Posts
:
340
-
Reward points
:
0
- Joined: 6/3/2008
-
Status: offline
|
RE: WOW on PS3?
-
Sunday, November 09, 2008 10:55 AM
WOW on the PS3 would be a pretty good idea. I mean 11 million people play it. I could actually see this happening. Their has been many rumors that WOW was coming to the consoles.
|
|
