RE: Do we need more shooters?

Logged in as: Guest

RE: Do we need more shooters?

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Gamers Lounge] >> Gaming Culture & Industry Discussion >> RE: Do we need more shooters?

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Do we need more shooters? - Apr.-25th-2008 13:54:28

SpaceCowgirl

Posts: 3476
Joined: Jul.-19th-2007
From: Andromeda
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSniper

I would be interested to see the result of an FPS designed by Space Cowgirl.

You would Fight Zombie Nazis, Led by Alien Terrorists, except instead of traditional guns you would be able to go through the whole game only killing enemies with physics based attacks (well you could use guns if you wanted) as well you would be able to transform into a big badass werewolf at any point in the game and run around tossing around cars and ripping enemies to pieces with their claws, feeding on their flesh would also regain your health.

_____________________________

(in reply to DarkSniper)

Post #: 21

RE: Do we need more shooters? - Apr.-25th-2008 13:55:39

Satanas

Posts: 4785
Joined: Apr.-30th-2007
From: GTA, ON, Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SpaceCowgirl

You would Fight Zombie Nazis, Led by Alien Terrorists, except instead of traditional guns you would be able to go through the whole game only killing enemies with physics based attacks (well you could use guns if you wanted) as well you would be able to transform into a big badass werewolf at any point in the game and run around tossing around cars and ripping enemies to pieces with their claws, feeding on their flesh would also regain your health.

Hell I'd play it. Sounds a lot more inventive than most other shooters.

_____________________________

KONAMI ID: mgo_satanas / MGO Character Name: Satanas

(in reply to SpaceCowgirl)

Post #: 22

RE: Do we need more shooters? - Apr.-25th-2008 14:15:30

Tempist

Posts: 1220
Joined: Jan.-30th-2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chacron

if you think that Halo3/COD4 aren't tactical - you're evidently playing on easy/normal.

No it's not. There's an element of just running and gunning and waiting for your mystical health to recharge.

Stalker is a far more tactical game than COD4 / Halo. Bullets bounce of the ground, you can shoot through objects. The AI is a hard mistress to out smart at times. You bleed and have to use medkits / bandages. No infinate running. You have the ability to upgrade guns with scopes, silencers. Sneaking is important.

You should look beyond the box for what tactical shooters should be like.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BrotherNick

More like bioshock, with it's focus on morality...I like thought provoking games.

Bioshock was good, but I take a bit of an issue with it's disregard for mortality. You can never truly die in that game since there's are regen booths everywhere you go. It does have props for it's story, but there was probably more that could be done to the game in the end.

Games like Stalker and Deus Ex everyonce in a while really help to change up the FPS genre. It would be in some ways wrong to expect games like those every year, but I'm glad they come out and age well.

(in reply to JHFKDFNFGJKFHDKF)

Post #: 23

RE: Do we need more shooters? - Apr.-25th-2008 14:18:05

Tempist

Posts: 1220
Joined: Jan.-30th-2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SpaceCowgirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSniper

I would be interested to see the result of an FPS designed by Space Cowgirl.

You would Fight Zombie Nazis, Led by Alien Terrorists, except instead of traditional guns you would be able to go through the whole game only killing enemies with physics based attacks (well you could use guns if you wanted) as well you would be able to transform into a big badass werewolf at any point in the game and run around tossing around cars and ripping enemies to pieces with their claws, feeding on their flesh would also regain your health.