Grannyvukka
Posts: 76
Joined: Apr.-6th-2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Odion ya ok except that there is no noticable difference between 30 FPS and 60 FPS, and I don't care what you think, see the wonderful thing about what I put my support behind is usually a game that has the critical acclaim to back it up. Just because you like it more doesn't make it the better game. Also TP 1 was well recieved, they have slowely fallen off since then. Also Go read up the timelines of when those key people left and when Perfect Dark came out. All those people from Golden Eye left extremely early in the PD development, meaning that PD was made without those guys and is almost as good as Golden Eye If you can't notice the difference between 60fps and 30, then you are blind my friend. Thats why every developer strives for 60fps, but most have trouble achieving it. Check out NFS compared to Burnout, checkout COD4 compared to COD3, or any other 30fps shooter. You seem to jump to your own illogical conclusion that I am attacking 30fps like it's crap...But I am simply stating the KNOWN (except by you) fact that 60fps is better than 30fps, just like 1080p is better than 720p..The only people who deny that are people who don;t want to except reality as it is. You seem to also think that because a game like halo had mass critical success and TS didn't. Well actually TS was much toted by gaming press, and TS2 was rated even better...Yes pt 3 wasn't as good, but EA were involved there. You see, not everyone is like you, and boasts something is more worth someones time because it is more (pop culture) popular than the other......(Thats probably why you have all Britany Spears albums when she was in her prime, as she was the best, biggest thng then too)...But contrary to all that, Halo was blown up to be bigger than Jesus because it was MS's only real hope at a system seller....Fact remains though that Goldeneye was infinately better for it's time, a was the trend setter for games like Halo and TS.
|