Dukester101
Posts: 4687
Joined: Mar.-27th-2007
From: Ohio
Status: offline
|
Japan knew that attacking the US was a stupid move (at least the commanders did), but the Japan leadership wanted to attack the US because it "wasnt" involved yet. Was it justifiable to drop 2 nuclear munitions on them? That will never be answered "correctly," but it's sufficient to say that it helped pave the way for Allied Forces to win WWII. If the United States had not gotten involved, Hitler and his forces would have overrun Europe and Britain, developed the nuclear bomb themselves, and declared world supremacy. It's always easy to look at a situation in hindsight and say it was wrong, or it was right. At the time, the United States administration decided that the best way to eliminate Japan and it's strength was to hit them hard. What better way to hit them hard than with a nuclear bomb? Not to mention it was a test to make sure the bomb performed as well as the scientists said it would. That was basically the reason we dropped 2 rather than 1. The first performed the desired effect, but could it be duplicated? The second proved that it could, and that the destructive power was great. Also, it proved that America was now in the war, and that we were not going to take shit from Japan, Italy, or Germany. America has also been the "sleeping giant," or the "force to be reckoned with." Sure it's true that two wrongs do not make a right, but look at Japan now. Is it a hostile nation anymore? No, it most certainly is not, and Japan has contributed a lot to the global economy since then. So in my opinion, dropping the bombs was a necessary evil. I think of it as doing some wrong for a greater good. And we all know that the US entering the war was a "good" thing. It's always good to stop a tyrannical psycho who wants to wipe out an entire race/type of people.
_____________________________
"Defensor Fortis (Defenders of the Force)" This post is provided as-is, with no warranties, and confers no rights.
|