RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are developing

Printable Version
All Forums >> [Main Gaming Forums] >> [PS3 Forums] >> PlayStation 3 Games >> RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are developing Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 20:42:24   
DrPirate


Posts: 2212
Joined: Apr.-24th-2007
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline
I'll stick to this then.

Because I completely 10000% understand where you're coming from.

Leipzig, Sony announces their purchase of quantic dream.

I realized I can find you all the proof in the world, but not one announcement of QD being owned by Sony.

Edit: Actually I found what I'm looking for. It just has Heavy Rain listed under Sony First Party games.

< Message edited by DrPirate -- Jul.-20th-2008 20:43:41 >

(in reply to Whoooop)
Post #: 21
RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 20:44:31   
pwnsause

 

Posts: 49
Joined: Jun.-16th-2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Odion

quote:

ORIGINAL: DrPirate

quote:

ORIGINAL: Odion

quote:

ORIGINAL: pwnsause

quote:

Heavy Rain
quote:

ORIGINAL: DrPirate

quote:

ORIGINAL: Le-mo

1st Party

Bigbig Studios = Possibly the next Hot Shots Golf game
Sony Online Entertainment = DC Universe Online, The Agency, Free Realms
Clap Hanz = ?
Evolution Studios = Motorstorm: Pacific Rift
Guerrilla Games = Killzone 2
Incognito = New exclusive to be unveiled
Naughty Dog Studios = Uncharted 2, Unknown PSN Game
SCE Bend = Resistance: Retribution
SCE Foster City = ?
SCE Japan = SIREN: Blood Curse, Afrika, The Last Guy
Team ICO = Two new exclusive in the work
SCE London Studio = SingStar: Vol.2, Home
SCE Santa Monica Studio = God of War III
Polyphony Digital = Gran Turismo 5
SCE San Diego Studio = NBA 09 The Inside
SCE Cambridge Studio = (Currently at Guerrila and writing PSedge tools, MAYBE incoprorating trophies to Heavenly Sword (ninja theory forum, stated from a developer there), will be working on frozen projects like Eight Days, which weren't canceled, but given a budget and manpower freeze)
SCE Studio Liverpool = Wipeout HD
SOE Denver = ?
Zipper Interactive = M.A.G.
Quantic Dreams = Heavy Rain: TOK (Confirmed btw...)

2nd Party

Cellius = Brave Arms, Second Season 01, Chain Lim!t
Eat Sleep Play = Three exclusive titles for PS3, one is Twisted Metal
Game Republic = ?
Idol Minds = Pain: Amusement Park expansion pack
Insomniac Games = Resistance 2, Ratchet and Clank: Quest for Booty
Media Molecule = Little Big Planet
Sucker Punch = Infamous
Slant Six Games = SOCOM: Confrontation
thatgamecompany = Flower, new exclusive TBA
Dark Star = Fat Princess

Tell me if I left anything out.


Also, I don't know if I should mention this. Q games is not first or second aprty, but they have a contract for 6 pixel junk games. After Pixel Junk Eden, they're making a Pixel Junk dungeon crawler.


Quantic Dream is Second Party, they are not owned by sony, they just have an exclusive contract for Heavy Rain as of right now.


no once again thats wrong, Quantic Dreams is a third party developer making a game for Sony, they are not a second party


No no, I'm not ignorant on these issues. Just trust me on that one.

If you'll question me again, you'll force me to go through a **** load of press releases and stuff, and while I DO have the time. I'd much rather listen to music :\


there is no need, they are making Heavy Rain by Sony but are not under legal contract to only make Sony games, and are not owned at all by Sony hence they are a Third Party who is making a game for Sony. Just like Remedy.


Sony is publishing the game, so its second party. if it was third party, someone else would be publishing this game, like UBISOFT. now do you understand the difference between 1st party, 2 party, and 3rd party?

(in reply to Odion)
Post #: 22
RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 20:45:08   
Whoooop


Posts: 1045
Joined: Mar.-22th-2007
Status: offline
Pirate.... Are you going to Heavy own him or what??? 


Oh my God.

PLEASE CUT THE QUOTE CHAIN

_____________________________


(in reply to DrPirate)
Post #: 23
RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 20:45:53   
DrPirate


Posts: 2212
Joined: Apr.-24th-2007
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline
Yeah I know. I made the mistake. I read Heavy Rain being first party, I must have minced words.

It's my mistake.

I still think Sony buys QD at Leipzig though :\


Edit:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Whoooop

Pirate.... Are you going to Heavy own him or what??? 


Oh my God.

PLEASE CUT THE QUOTE CHAIN


No I didn't quote see? I knew it bothered you :)

(in reply to pwnsause)
Post #: 24
RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 20:48:06   
Whoooop


Posts: 1045
Joined: Mar.-22th-2007
Status: offline
haha

It's cool..  When you post before it, I thought: Thank God Pirate stoped the chain and then BAM... Quote chain again.  :)

_____________________________


(in reply to DrPirate)
Post #: 25
RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 20:56:33   
harry190


Posts: 3864
Joined: Feb.-10th-2008
From: Why do you want to know you BIG pervert
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Whoooop

Pirate.... Are you going to Heavy own him or what??? 


Oh my God.




That happens so much that it does not mean anything really anymore.


Thanks for the thread. Nice info.

_____________________________



I am your father and your mother.

(in reply to Whoooop)
Post #: 26
RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 20:58:24   
DrPirate


Posts: 2212
Joined: Apr.-24th-2007
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline
Well in an official Sony release, they certainly had Heavy Rain being a first party title.

Does this just mean they own the IP and QD are doing it, or does it mean they were bought?

This is why I made the mistake. I won't be owning anyone if I was wrong. It was a legitimate error I think.

(in reply to harry190)
Post #: 27
RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 21:00:19   
TwissT


Posts: 2684
Joined: Nov.-25th-2007
From: Toronto, Canada
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: DrPirate

Well in an official Sony release, they certainly had Heavy Rain being a first party title.

Does this just mean they own the IP and QD are doing it, or does it mean they were bought?

This is why I made the mistake. I won't be owning anyone if I was wrong. It was a legitimate error I think.


Dude you're a guido don't admit to your faults, just blame it on your girlfriend! YAAHHH!

_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: LJWooly
quote:

ORIGINAL: Solid_Snake
i've learned something today.. not all black guys can dance
They don't all have massive penises, either.

(in reply to DrPirate)
Post #: 28
RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 21:08:58   
DrPirate


Posts: 2212
Joined: Apr.-24th-2007
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TwissT

quote:

ORIGINAL: DrPirate

Well in an official Sony release, they certainly had Heavy Rain being a first party title.

Does this just mean they own the IP and QD are doing it, or does it mean they were bought?

This is why I made the mistake. I won't be owning anyone if I was wrong. It was a legitimate error I think.


Dude you're a guido don't admit to your faults, just blame it on your girlfriend! YAAHHH!


Yeah I thought it was a good joke at first, now it went all stale. I'll try to find a new meme to change too.

I was thinking Frat Boy? Or Moonies.

(in reply to TwissT)
Post #: 29
RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 21:10:18   
TwissT


Posts: 2684
Joined: Nov.-25th-2007
From: Toronto, Canada
Status: online
What about the boarder line metrosexual/homosexual?

NO!!!!!! SCRATCH ALL THAT!!!!

WHAT ABOUT, SCIENTOLOGIST?!

< Message edited by TwissT -- Jul.-20th-2008 21:12:50 >


_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: LJWooly
quote:

ORIGINAL: Solid_Snake
i've learned something today.. not all black guys can dance
They don't all have massive penises, either.

(in reply to DrPirate)
Post #: 30
RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 21:17:34   
Juno


Posts: 1827
Joined: Mar.-22th-2007
Status: offline
Just cut the confusion and say what are these developers making for sony.

(in reply to TwissT)
Post #: 31
RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 21:45:22   
Odion


Posts: 8244
Joined: Apr.-16th-2007
Status: online
Guys I'll show the definition of a second party again

In the video game industry, a second-party developer is a developer who, while being a separate entity from any console manufacturer, is tied to a specific one usually through contract or partial ownership and makes games specifically for that console manufacturer.
The defining characteristic is that a second-party developer is a company completely separate from the manufacturer, while first-party developers are considered to be a "division" of the console maker itself.



QD is not owned by Sony, and they are also not under contract to just make Sony games, HR could be a Sony owned title, but that still does not make them a second party developer.



This concept is not hard people, unless a company is owned or under legal contract to make games only for one Manufacturer then they are not considered a second party they are consider a third party.

(in reply to Juno)
Post #: 32
RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 21:47:51   
harry190


Posts: 3864
Joined: Feb.-10th-2008
From: Why do you want to know you BIG pervert
Status: offline
Calm down amigo. Third party,2nd party who cares what they are called. You only get to play
Heavy Rain and LBP on the PS3 and Gears and Halo on the 360. That is the only thing that matters.

Edit: Oops,forgot PC.

_____________________________



I am your father and your mother.

(in reply to Odion)
Post #: 33
RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 21:49:46   
Juno


Posts: 1827
Joined: Mar.-22th-2007
Status: offline
I'm still confused Odion. Second Party sounds like 1st. So Would Bioshock be considered Second Party because they had contract for timed exclusive?

(in reply to harry190)
Post #: 34
RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 21:50:55   
DrPirate


Posts: 2212
Joined: Apr.-24th-2007
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Odion
This concept is not hard people, unless a company is owned or under legal contract to make games only for one Manufacturer then they are not considered a second party they are consider a third party.


Yeah, I've got it. I already admitted to making the mistake though :\

(in reply to Odion)
Post #: 35
RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 22:00:11   
NO_PUDding


Posts: 684
Joined: Oct.-28th-2007
Status: online
Okay... you are all stupid. Third party in this respect is exclsuive, but obviously most third party games are multiplatform.


First Party = Internal developer owned by it's respective hardware company and published by them too. ( E.g. Guerilla Games and SCEE with Killzone2)
 
Second Party = External developer, independant or partially owned, published by the respective hardware company. (E.g. Insomniac and SCEA with Resistance 2)

Third Party = External developer, independant or inclusive of a seperate publishing company. (E.g. Kojima Productions and Konami with Metal Gear Solid 4)


By the way, not to jinx Insomniac, but multiplatform seems unlikely, they have never made a game on anything outside the PS brand. They say they are doing fine right now, and they are focusing on the PS3. They obviously see more of a future in PS3.

Second Party is the complicated part, and it has no relation to contracts of exclusivity, it is in relation to who publishes it. If Microsoft Games Studios, publishes a game developed by an external studio, then the game is Second Party. If the game is developed and produced by someone other than the hardware company, and it's exclusive, it's a Third Party exclusive.

Bioshock was a Third Party exclusive, and it remains that way, even when Microsoft paid for the marketing. It was not published (shipped) by them.

< Message edited by NO_PUDding -- Jul.-20th-2008 22:06:29 >

(in reply to Whoooop)
Post #: 36
RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 22:02:25   
DrPirate


Posts: 2212
Joined: Apr.-24th-2007
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NO_PUDding

Okay... you are all stupid. Third party in this respect is exclsuive, but obviously most third party games are multiplatform.


I like your style.

(in reply to NO_PUDding)
Post #: 37
RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 22:05:03   
grantps3

 

Posts: 590
Joined: Jun.-3th-2008
Status: offline
why doesnt sony buy insomniac? or quantum dreams?
and i never knew that sucker punch was 2nd

but if LBP is good sony needs to buy media molecule

(in reply to DrPirate)
Post #: 38
RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 22:06:36   
Jon_Smackenrow


Posts: 1234
Joined: Jul.-9th-2007
Status: online
Firebrand- Never Die Alone. it's using the Hyperbole-Tec Engine.

(in reply to Whoooop)
Post #: 39
RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 22:07:45   
NO_PUDding


Posts: 684
Joined: Oct.-28th-2007
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: DrPirate

quote:

ORIGINAL: NO_PUDding

Okay... you are all stupid. Third party in this respect is exclsuive, but obviously most third party games are multiplatform.


I like your style.


Haha, needed to be said. Especially since I know what I am talking about.


EDIT: @grantps3

Sucker Punch is First Party. Sony own the company.

And Sony won't buy Insomniac becuase they are confident about Insomniacs sentiment towards the PS3. And as for media molecule, they may possess the same views as Insomniac. People don't always need to snatch up indie developers to monopolise, Sony doesn't want that.

If they were to invest in another developer, they should try to diversify. it's become shockingly apparent they have no RPG developers. 

< Message edited by NO_PUDding -- Jul.-20th-2008 22:10:32 >

(in reply to DrPirate)
Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Main Gaming Forums] >> [PS3 Forums] >> PlayStation 3 Games >> RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are developing Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode

0.234