RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are developing

Logged in as: Guest

RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are developing

All Forums >> [Main Gaming Forums] >> [PS3 Forums] >> PlayStation 3 Games >> RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are developing

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 22:10:10

DrPirate

Posts: 2536
Joined: Apr.-24th-2007
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: NO_PUDding

quote:

ORIGINAL: DrPirate

quote:

ORIGINAL: NO_PUDding

Okay... you are all stupid. Third party in this respect is exclsuive, but obviously most third party games are multiplatform.

I like your style.

Haha, needed to be said. Especially since I know what I am talking about.

Funny because I was not sarcastic. I was being completely serious. Never change.

_____________________________

Resistance Defense Force

(in reply to NO_PUDding)

Post #: 41

RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 22:10:22

TwissT

Posts: 3726
Joined: Nov.-25th-2007
From: Toronto, Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NO_PUDding

Haha, needed to be said. Especially since I know what I am talking about.

That's a really good way to get people's attention.

_____________________________

The Answer is 42

(in reply to NO_PUDding)

Post #: 42

RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 22:12:22

harry190

Posts: 4282
Joined: Feb.-10th-2008
From: Why do you want to know you BIG pervert
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NO_PUDding

quote:

ORIGINAL: DrPirate

quote:

ORIGINAL: NO_PUDding

Okay... you are all stupid. Third party in this respect is exclsuive, but obviously most third party games are multiplatform.

I like your style.

Haha, needed to be said. Especially since I know what I am talking about.

EDIT: @grantps3

Sucker Punch is First Party. Sony own the company.

And Sony won't buy Insomniac becuase they are confident about Insomniacs sentiment towards the PS3. And as for media molecule, they may possess the same views as Insomniac. People don't always need to snatch up indie developers to monopolise, Sony doesn't want that.

If they were to invest in another developer, they should try to diversify. it's become shockingly apparent they have no RPG developers.

Don't get cocky. There is already too much generalization in your comment.

_____________________________

I am your father and your mother.

(in reply to NO_PUDding)

Post #: 43

RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 22:13:42

NO_PUDding

Posts: 922
Joined: Oct.-28th-2007
Status: offline

Thanks Dr Pirate... It crossed my mind you were being sarcastic, but I decided you weren't.

And indeed TwissT, if I got your attention, and then informed you well, then I am pleased.

EDIT: @harry190

Promise you I am not cocky, but generalisation? Where? I simplified things a bit, but there was no way to generalise in that comment. There was also some assumptions made that MM might have the same sentiment towards Sony, especially if they treated them well. And they supplied them quickly with their own studio, gave them financial and schedule liberty, so I can see they would not protest working with Sony again.

It's also true Sony may want to monopolise, but I doubt it. They know it's not healthy for the industry and simply scouting for innovative games for 2nd party futures seems more sensible.

And finally... RPG's. Sony has no internal developer that produces RPG's as their staple.

< Message edited by NO_PUDding -- Jul.-20th-2008 22:20:15 >

(in reply to TwissT)

Post #: 44

RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 22:26:36

harry190

Posts: 4282
Joined: Feb.-10th-2008
From: Why do you want to know you BIG pervert
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NO_PUDding

Thanks Dr Pirate... It crossed my mind you were being sarcastic, but I decided you weren't.

And indeed TwissT, if I got your attention, and then informed you well, then I am pleased.

EDIT: @harry190

Promise you I am not cocky, but generalisation? Where? I simplified things a bit, but there was no way to generalise in that comment. There was also some assumptions made that MM might have the same sentiment towards Sony, especially if they treated them well. And they supplied them quickly with their own studio, gave them financial and schedule liberty, so I can see they would not protest working with Sony again.

It's also true Sony may want to monopolise, but I doubt it. They know it's not healthy for the industry and simply scouting for innovative games for 2nd party futures seems more sensible.

And finally... RPG's. Sony has no internal developer that produces RPG's as their staple.

Yes you did. All of you are stupid.. Well I may be pushing too far into it,but it was not relevant to every post in this thread making this inaccurate.
Ah well,nevermind,at least you clarified the situation.

_____________________________

I am your father and your mother.

(in reply to NO_PUDding)

Post #: 45

RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 22:28:53

DrPirate

Posts: 2536
Joined: Apr.-24th-2007
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: harry190

quote:

ORIGINAL: NO_PUDding

Thanks Dr Pirate... It crossed my mind you were being sarcastic, but I decided you weren't.

And indeed TwissT, if I got your attention, and then informed you well, then I am pleased.

EDIT: @harry190

Promise you I am not cocky, but generalisation? Where? I simplified things a bit, but there was no way to generalise in that comment. There was also some assumptions made that MM might have the same sentiment towards Sony, especially if they treated them well. And they supplied them quickly with their own studio, gave them financial and schedule liberty, so I can see they would not protest working with Sony again.

It's also true Sony may want to monopolise, but I doubt it. They know it's not healthy for the industry and simply scouting for innovative games for 2nd party futures seems more sensible.

And finally... RPG's. Sony has no internal developer that produces RPG's as their staple.

Yes you did. All of you are stupid.. Well I may be pushing too far into it,but it was not relevant to every post in this thread making this inaccurate.
Ah well,nevermind,at least you clarified the situation.

You lack the same style he has. Some people can pull it off, like me and Toughname. You should stick to what you're good at Harry.

I understood what he meant. He was basically saying: stfu everyone, look, it's that simple. I like that.

_____________________________

Resistance Defense Force

(in reply to harry190)

Post #: 46

RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 23:31:40

Tidus11

Posts: 50
Joined: May-9th-2008
From: minnesota
Status: offline

Quote:Figboy

SECOND PARTY:

1)Insomniac: working on Resistance 2 and Ratchet: QFB (their North Carolina studio just opened, so i don't expect hearing from them until next year or later)

2)Slant Six: working on SOCOM: Confrontation

3)Ready At Dawn (known for Daxter/God of War: Chains of Olympus): currently researching PS3 for upcoming titles

4)Sucker Punch: working on inFamous

5)Game Republic: known for Folklore, Toy Home, Dark Mist. currently working on a few unannounced PS3 titles.

6) Media Molecule: working on Little Big Planet, Rag Doll Kung Fu: Fists of Plastic.

7) Cellius: working on unannounced PS3 titles

8) NC Soft: working on unannounced PS3 titles

9) Quantic Dream: working on Heavy Rain

10) thatgamecompany: working on flower

11) Queasy Games: everyday shooter. no doubt working on another PSN title.

FIRST PARTY:

1) SOE Seattle: working on The Agency

2) SCE Bend - : working on Resistance: PSP, researching PS3 for titles.

3) SOE Foster City: researching PS3 for titles.

4) SCE Santa Monica: working on God of War 3

5) Naughty Dog: working on Uncharted 2, possibly Jak and Daxter PS3 (i imagine if this Ratchet and Clank Future: QFB thing works out for Insomniac, Naughty Dog may reintroduce Jak and Daxter on the PS3 in the same method: small, $14.99 title).

6) Zipper Interactive: working on MAG

7) Incognito: working on various Warhawk expansions, they also confirmed via Playstation Blog that they're working on another game in tandem.

8) SCE San Diego: working on MLB: The Show

9) SOE: workingo n DC Universe

10) SCE Cambridge: researching PS3 for titles.

11) SCE Liverpool: working on Wipeout HD

12) BigBig Studios: researching PS3 for titles.

13) Evolution: working on Motorstorm Pacific Rift

14) Guerrilla Games: working on Killzone 2

15) SCE London: helping with Killzone 2, formerly developing The Getaway and Eight Days.

16) Clap Hanz: known for Hot Shots Golf, no doubt working on another Hot Shots Golf game.

17) SCE Japan: known for Eye of Judgment, echochrome. working on a few unannounced PS3 titles

18) Team Ico: working on two unannounced PS3 titles.

19) Polyphony Digital: working on Gran Turismo 5.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Above the line is all the stuff figboy said I just got done reading this in a comment section and thought this would fit nicely in here

_____________________________

(in reply to DrPirate)

Post #: 47

RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-20th-2008 23:56:25

NO_PUDding

Posts: 922
Joined: Oct.-28th-2007
Status: offline

Tidus

About no.7, nicely picked up. I also noticed that. The developer was really smart assed it was awesome.

Someone said something about them only releasing expansions for current games, and he came back and slammed them with something along the lines of 'Well we liked to please the fans, and it's good if we can work on new stuff at the same time,' with a little wink....

Ahh, nice comeback.

Anyway, good catch, but I suspect it's still in the very conceptual stage.

(in reply to Tidus11)

Post #: 48

RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-21th-2008 0:07:26

Whoooop

Posts: 1685
Joined: Mar.-22th-2007
Status: offline

My god.... Tidus Quote gave me a hard on...... in my heart..
.
.
.
.
See Pirate.... How I avoided the long quote???? haha

:)

_____________________________

(in reply to Tidus11)

Post #: 49

RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-21th-2008 0:35:31

Odion

Posts: 9755
Joined: Apr.-16th-2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NO_PUDding

quote:

ORIGINAL: DrPirate

quote:

ORIGINAL: NO_PUDding

Okay... you are all stupid. Third party in this respect is exclsuive, but obviously most third party games are multiplatform.

I like your style.

Haha, needed to be said. Especially since I know what I am talking about.

EDIT: @grantps3

Sucker Punch is First Party. Sony own the company.

And Sony won't buy Insomniac becuase they are confident about Insomniacs sentiment towards the PS3. And as for media molecule, they may possess the same views as Insomniac. People don't always need to snatch up indie developers to monopolise, Sony doesn't want that.

If they were to invest in another developer, they should try to diversify. it's become shockingly apparent they have no RPG developers.

No he's right Sucker Punch is a second party developer, and MM won't let them buy them out because the reason they broke off from Lionhead was because they wanted to be independent.

A studio is only consider second party if they cannot/will not make games for anyone else, Rare was a second party for Nintendo, Nintendo owned like 40% of the company.

(in reply to NO_PUDding)

Post #: 50

RE: What Sony's 1st and 2nd party developers are develo... - Jul.-21th-2008 7:28:45

NO_PUDding

Posts: 922
Joined: Oct.-28th-2007
Status: offline

You don't understand 2nd party then. SuckerPunch is owned by SCEA and it's therefore 1st party.

You can't be sure about Media Molecule, companies minds can chnage and with the freedom that Sony give them (and all their 1st party) everyone woudl reconsider beign indie.

(in reply to Odion)

Post #: 51